UNPIVOTを実行してから、データをPIVOTすると、パフォーマンスが向上する可能性があります。
DECLARE @T TABLE
( VALUE_A INT, COUNT_A INT, VALUE_B INT, COUNT_B INT, VALUE_C INT, COUNT_C INT, VALUE_D INT, COUNT_D INT, VALUE_E INT,
COUNT_E INT, VALUE_F INT, COUNT_F INT, VALUE_G INT, COUNT_G INT, VALUE_H INT, COUNT_H INT, VALUE_I INT, COUNT_I INT
);
INSERT @T VALUES (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1);
WITH D AS
( SELECT Category = SUBSTRING(B, 7, LEN(B)), [Type] = 'Value', A
FROM @T
UNPIVOT
( A
FOR B IN ([VALUE_A], [VALUE_B], [VALUE_C], [VALUE_D], [VALUE_E], [VALUE_F], [VALUE_G], [VALUE_H], [VALUE_I])
) upvt
UNION ALL
SELECT Category = SUBSTRING(B, 7, LEN(B)), [Type] = 'Count', A
FROM @T
UNPIVOT
( A
FOR B IN ([COUNT_A], [COUNT_B], [COUNT_C], [COUNT_D], [COUNT_E], [COUNT_F], [COUNT_G], [COUNT_H], [COUNT_I])
) upvt
)
SELECT *
FROM D
PIVOT
( SUM(A)
FOR [Type] IN ([Value], [Count])
) pvt;
必要に応じて、システムビューに列名を照会することにより、これを動的に行うこともできます。
補遺
これは、UNIONとPIVOTではなく結合で実現できることに気づきました。PIVOT操作が削除されるため、結合のパフォーマンスが向上すると思います。どちらがデータに最適かを確認するために、両方をテストすることをお勧めします。
WITH Val AS
( SELECT Category = SUBSTRING(B, 7, LEN(B)), A
FROM @T
UNPIVOT
( A
FOR B IN ([VALUE_A], [VALUE_B], [VALUE_C], [VALUE_D], [VALUE_E], [VALUE_F], [VALUE_G], [VALUE_H], [VALUE_I])
) upvt
), Co AS
( SELECT Category = SUBSTRING(B, 7, LEN(B)), A
FROM @T
UNPIVOT
( A
FOR B IN ([COUNT_A], [COUNT_B], [COUNT_C], [COUNT_D], [COUNT_E], [COUNT_F], [COUNT_G], [COUNT_H], [COUNT_I])
) upvt
)
SELECT val.Category,
[Value] = val.A,
[Count] = co.A
FROM val
INNER JOIN co
ON co.Category = val.Category;