以下は機能し、テストはパスします。しかし、呼び出しでアセンブリ名を明示的に渡さなければならないことに不満があります。より良い方法はありますか?
public static object ToType<T>(this object obj, T type, string assembly, IDictionary<string,string> maps) {
//create instance of T type object:
var tmp = Activator.CreateInstance(assembly, type.ToString());
foreach( var map in maps) {
try
{
PropertyInfo source = obj.GetType()
.GetProperty(map.Value);
tmp.Unwrap().GetType().GetProperty(map.Key)
.SetValue(tmp.Unwrap(), source.GetValue(obj, null), null);
}
catch
{
throw new ArgumentException("Error converting to Type: "+type);
}
}
return tmp.Unwrap();
}
[Test]
public void TestToTypeExtension()
{
Source item = new Source();
item.OtherObj_One = "1234567890";
item.OtherObj_Code = "IBM.N";
item.OtherObj_CodeType = "S";
item.OtherObj_CodeGroup = "EQUITY";
Target row = (Target)item.ToType(typeof(Target), ((typeof(Target)).Assembly).FullName, Target.map);
Assert.AreEqual(item.OtherObj_One, row.One);
Assert.AreEqual(item.OtherObj_Code, row.Code);
Assert.AreEqual(item.OtherObj_CodeType, row.CodeType);
}
public class Target
{
public static Dictionary<String, String> map = new Dictionary<string, string>{
{"One" ,"OtherObj_One"},
{"Code" ,"OtherObj_Code"},
{"CodeType" ,"OtherObj_CodeType"},
};
public String One { get; set; }
public String Code { get; set; }
public String CodeType { get; set; }
}
public class Source
{
public String OtherObj_One { get; set; }
public String OtherObj_Code { get; set; }
public String OtherObj_CodeType { get; set; }
public String OtherObj_CodeGroup { get; set; }
}
アップデート:
((typeof(T)).Assembly).FullName
拡張メソッド内で実行される値は次のとおりです。mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089
オブジェクト作成ステートメントを に変更するT tmp = Activator.CreateInstance<T>();
と、次のエラーが発生します。
Test Name: TestToTypeExtension
Test FullName: Solution.Test.UtilsTests.TestToTypeExtension
Test Source: [ ... ]\UnitTestProject1\UtilsTests.cs : line 39
Test Outcome: Failed
Test Duration: 0:00:00.071
Result Message: System.MissingMethodException : Cannot create an abstract class.
Result StackTrace:
at System.RuntimeTypeHandle.CreateInstance(RuntimeType type, Boolean publicOnly, Boolean noCheck, Boolean& canBeCached, RuntimeMethodHandleInternal& ctor, Boolean& bNeedSecurityCheck)
at System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceSlow(Boolean publicOnly, Boolean skipCheckThis, Boolean fillCache, StackCrawlMark& stackMark)
at System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceDefaultCtor(Boolean publicOnly, Boolean skipCheckThis, Boolean fillCache, StackCrawlMark& stackMark)
at System.Activator.CreateInstance[T]()
at Util.MappingExtensions.ToType[T](Object obj, T type, String assembly, IDictionary`2 maps) in [ ... ]\Utils\MappingExtensions.cs:line 22
at Solution.Test.UtilsTests.TestToTypeExtension() in [ ... ]\UnitTestProject1\UtilsTests.cs:line 46
Update2
勝利コード (関連する List 拡張を含む) は、次のとおりです。ところで、拡張機能は、linqselect new
式 (つまりselect new {prop1 = x, prop2 = y}
) によって返されるものなどの匿名型に対して機能します。これが私の主な動機でした。
public static object ToType<T>(this object obj, IDictionary<string, string> maps)
where T : new()
{
T tmp = new T();
Type objType = obj.GetType();
Type tType = typeof(T);
foreach( var map in maps) {
try
{
PropertyInfo source = objType.GetProperty(map.Value);
tType.GetProperty(map.Key)
.SetValue(tmp, source.GetValue(obj, null), null);
}
catch
{
throw new ArgumentException("Error converting to Type: "+ tType);
}
}
return tmp;
}
public static List<T> ToTypeList<T,U>(this List<U> source
, IDictionary<string, string> maps)
where T : new ()
{
List<T> result = new List<T>();
foreach (var item in source)
{
result.Add((T)item.ToType<T>(maps));
}
return result;
}