クラスの関数を生成するためのプリプロセッサ ディレクティブをいくつか作成しました。Boost 1.55 では、すべて正常に動作します。Boost 1.57 に変更しようとすると、奇妙なコンパイル エラーが発生します。
プログラムは次のとおりです。
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/preprocessor.hpp>
#ifndef BOOST_PP_VARIADICS
#define BOOST_PP_VARIADICS
#endif
#define ADD_CONST_REF(op, data, elem) elem const &
#define FUNCTION_DECL(r, data, tup) \
double BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(0, tup) \
BOOST_PP_IF(BOOST_PP_LIST_IS_NIL(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_TO_LIST(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(1, tup))), \
(), \
BOOST_PP_SEQ_TO_TUPLE( \
BOOST_PP_SEQ_TRANSFORM(ADD_CONST_REF, \
_, \
BOOST_PP_TUPLE_TO_SEQ(BOOST_PP_LIST_TO_TUPLE(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_TO_LIST(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(1, tup)))) \
) \
) \
) \
const;
#define MY_FUNCTIONS(seq) \
BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH(FUNCTION_DECL, _, seq)
class Foo
{
public:
MY_FUNCTIONS( \
((a, (int))) \
((b) ) \
)
};
#define ADD_ARG(op, data, elem) elem const & BOOST_PP_CAT(a_, elem)
#define MY_FUNCTION_BEGIN(tup) \
double Foo::BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(0, tup) \
BOOST_PP_IF(BOOST_PP_LIST_IS_NIL(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_TO_LIST(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(1, tup))), \
(), \
BOOST_PP_SEQ_TO_TUPLE( \
BOOST_PP_SEQ_TRANSFORM( \
ADD_ARG, \
_, \
BOOST_PP_TUPLE_TO_SEQ(BOOST_PP_LIST_TO_TUPLE(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_TO_LIST(BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM(1, tup)))) \
) \
) \
) const \
{
#define MY_FUNCTION_END() }
MY_FUNCTION_BEGIN((a, (int)))
{
std::cout << "Foo::a(" << a_int << ")\n";
}
MY_FUNCTION_END()
MY_FUNCTION_BEGIN((b))
{
std::cout << "Foo::b()\n";
}
MY_FUNCTION_END()
int main()
{
Foo f;
f.a(42);
f.b();
return 0;
}
gcc 4.9.1 では、次の出力が得られます。
test.cpp:33:1: error: macro "BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_III" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given
)
^
test.cpp:33:1: error: macro "BOOST_PP_VARIADIC_ELEM_2" requires 4 arguments, but only 2 given
test.cpp:60:1: error: macro "BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_III" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given
MY_FUNCTION_BEGIN((b))
^
test.cpp:60:1: error: macro "BOOST_PP_VARIADIC_ELEM_2" requires 4 arguments, but only 2 given
clang 3.5.0 は私に言います:
test.cpp:30:3: error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
MY_FUNCTIONS( \
^
test.cpp:25:25: note: expanded from macro 'MY_FUNCTIONS'
BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH(FUNCTION_DECL, _, seq)
^
..../boost.1_57_0/boost/preprocessor/seq/for_each.hpp:26:67: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH'
# define BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH(macro, data, seq) BOOST_PP_FOR((macro, data, seq (nil)), BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH_P, BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH_O, BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH_M)
^
..../boost.1_57_0/boost/preprocessor/repetition/detail/for.hpp:22:78: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_FOR_1'
# define BOOST_PP_FOR_1(s, p, o, m) BOOST_PP_FOR_1_C(BOOST_PP_BOOL(p(2, s)), s, p, o, m)
^
note: (skipping 18 expansions in backtrace; use -fmacro-backtrace-limit=0 to see all)
packages/boost/boost_i4/boost/preprocessor/seq/elem.hpp:22:39: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM'
# define BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(i, seq) BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_I(i, seq)
^
packages/boost/boost_i4/boost/preprocessor/seq/elem.hpp:41:45: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_I'
# define BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_I(i, seq) BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_II(BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_ ## i seq)
^
packages/boost/boost_i4/boost/preprocessor/seq/elem.hpp:43:62: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_II'
# define BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_II(im) BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_III(im)
^
packages/boost/boost_i4/boost/preprocessor/seq/elem.hpp:44:13: note: macro 'BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_III' defined here
# define BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM_III(x, _) x
Boost 1.57 に変更した後の問題を知っている人はいますか?