それを解析して、このようにカスタムクラスを書く必要があると思います
public interface StringEquals{
public boolean equals(String s1, String s2);
}
public class Equals implements StringEquals{
private String mS1;
private STring mS2;
public NotEquals(String s1, String s2){
mS1 = s1;
mS2 = s2;
}
public boolean equals(){
return mSq1.equals(mS2);
}
}
public class NotEquals implements StringEquals{
private String mS1;
private STring mS2;
public NotEquals(String s1, String s2){
mS1 = s1;
mS2 = s2;
}
public boolean equals(){
return !mS1.equals(mS2);
}
}
public class AndGroup{
private List<StringEquals> mStrings;
public AndGroup(List<StringEquals> list){
mStrings = list;
}
public boolean getResult(){
for(StringEquals e: mStrings){
if (!e.equals()){
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
and a class to parse it:
public boolean eval(String evalString){
List<AndGroup> groups = new LinkedList<AndGroup>();
String[] ands = evalString.split("OR");
for (String andExp : ands){
List<StringEquals> list = new LinkedList<StringEquals>();
String compares = andExp.split("AND");
for (String comp: compares){
if (comp.contains("!="){
String[] notEqual = comp.split("!=");
list.add(new NotEquals(notEqual[0], notEqual[1]));
} else {
String[] equal = comp.split("=");
list.add(new Equals(equal[0], equal[1]);
}
}
groups.add(new AndGroup(list));
}
for (AndGroup g: groups){
if (g.getResult()){
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
テストされていませんが、正しい方向に向けられるかもしれません