0

ブラスト出力を含む巨大なファイルがあり、クエリ ID、サブジェクト gi、およびフレーム (基本的には行全体) を選択する必要があり、e 値が最も低く、重複行を省略します (他のより高い e 値を持つ他のすべての行を省略します)。ファイルは次のようになります。

# BLASTX 2.2.28+
# 0 hits found
# BLASTX 2.2.28+
# Query: Tx6_c1_seq1
# Database: /mnt/swissprot
# Fields: query id, subject gi, subject title, subject length, gap opens, q. start, q. end, s. start, s. end, evalue, % subject coverage, % identity, query/sbjct frames
# 24 hits found
Tx6_c1_seq1 6439823 RecName: Full=E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase siah-1; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 1 434 1   9   173 224 282 1e-06   65  32.20   3/0
Tx6_c1_seq1 577332  RecName: Full=Putative E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SINAT1; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 1    305 1   9   179 111 171 3e-05   67  32.79   3/0
Tx6_c1_seq1 3548505 RecName: Full=E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase siah-1; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 1 419 2   9   173 209 267 8e-05   65  32.20   3/0
Tx6_c1_seq1 577547  RecName: Full=E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase siah2; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 2; AltName: Full=Xsiah-2   313 1   15  173 125 181 2e-04   62  29.82   3/0
Tx6_c1_seq1 577417  RecName: Full=E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Siah1; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 1; Short=Siah-1    282 1   15  173 96  152 3e-04   62  29.82   3/0
Tx6_c1_seq1 577554  RecName: Full=E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SINAT2; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 2 308 1   9   179 114 174 4e-04   67  31.15   3/0
# BLASTX 2.2.28+
# Query: Tx_11_c0_seq1
# Database: /mnt/swissprot
# Fields: query id, subject gi, subject title, subject length, gap opens, q. start, q. end, s. start, s. end, evalue, % subject coverage, % identity, query/sbjct frames
# 1 hits found
Tx_11_c0_seq1   977285  RecName: Full=120.7 kDa protein in NOF-FB transposable element  1056    15  957 28  147 455 8e-13   79  27.81   -2/0
# BLASTX 2.2.28+
# Query: Tx_11_c1_seq1

この場合の予想される出力は、e_value が最も小さい次の 2 行のみである必要があります。

Tx6_c1_seq1 6439823 RecName: Full=E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase siah-1; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 1 434 1   9   173 224 282 1e-06   65  32.20   3/0
Tx_11_c0_seq1   977285  RecName: Full=120.7 kDa protein in NOF-FB transposable element  1056

コードを作成しましたが、動作していないようです。この問題を解決するために私を助けてください。お時間とご協力をいただければ幸いです。これは私がこれまでに持っているものです:

#!/usr/bin/perl -w

# Author:
# 01/07/2014
# This script removes duplicate records from a "short" format BLAST output file, and keeps only the "best" records  (sorts by smallest e-value and then biggest percent identity)
# Usage: bestblast.pl <input file> <output file>

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#Deal with passed parameters
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#If no arguments are passed, show usage message and exit program.
if ($#ARGV == -1) {
    usage("BLAST BEST 1.0 2014");
    exit;
}

#get the names of the input file (first argument passed) and output file (second argument passed)
$in_file = $ARGV[0];
$out_file = $ARGV[1];

#Open the input file for reading, open the output file for writing.
#If either are unsuccessful, print an error message and exit program.
unless ( open(IN, "$in_file") ) {
    usage("Got a bad input file: $in_file");
    exit;
}
unless ( open(OUT, ">$out_file") ) {
    usage("Got a bad output file: $out_file");
    exit;
}

#Everything looks good. Print the parameters we've found.
print "Parameters:\ninput file = $in_file\noutput file = $out_file\n\n";

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#The main event
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$counter = 0;
$total_counter = 0;

print "De-duplicating File...\n";

@in = <IN>;

#Do stuff for each line of text in the input file.
foreach $line (@in) {
    #if the line starts with a pound symbol, it is not real data, so skip this line.
    if ( $line =~ /^#/ ) {
     next;
     }

    #Count the total number of data lines in the file.
    $total_counter++;

    #The chomp commands removes any new line (and carriage return) characters from the end of the line.
    chomp($line);

    #Split up the tab delimited line, naming only the variables we are interested in (i.e. query id, subject gi, subject title, subject length, gap opens, q. start, q. end, s. start, s. end, evalue, % subject coverage, % identity, query/sbjct frames)
    ($query_id, $subject_gi, $subject_title, $subject_length, $gap_opens, $q_start, $q_end, $s_start, $s_end, $evalue, $subject_coverage, $identity, $query_sbjct_frames) = split(/\t/, $line);

    #check to see if the id label is already in the list of ids (called dedupe)
    #if its not there, add it.
    if ( $dedupe{$query_id} ) {
    #if it is, look at the old line to see if it is still "better" than the new one.
    ($query_id, $subject_gi, $subject_title, $subject_length, $gap_opens, $q_start, $q_end, $s_start, $s_end, $list_evalue, $subject_coverage, $list_identity, $query_sbjct_frames) = split(/\t/,$dedupe{$query_id});

    #if the new evalue is better than the old one, change the value of this id to the new line.
    #otherwise, if the new evalue is the same, and the percent_identity is better, change the value of this id to the new line.
    #otherwise, don't do anything (keep the old line).
    if ( $evalue < $list_evalue ) {
        $dedupe{$query_id} = $line;
    }
    elsif ( $evalue == $list_evalue ) {
        if ( $identity > $list_identity ) {
        $dedupe{$query_id} = $line;
        }
    }
    }
    else {
    $dedupe{$query_id} = $line;
    #count the number of non-duplicated lines we have.
    $counter++;
    }
}
print "Total # records = $total_counter\nBest only # records = $counter\n";
print "Writing to output file...\n";

#Print the final "dedupe" list to the new file (adding the new line back on the end).
foreach $query_id (sort keys %dedupe) {
    print OUT "$dedupe{$query_id}\n";
}

#Close the files.
close(IN);
close(OUT);
print "Done.\n";

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#Subroutines
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sub usage {
    my($message) = @_;
    print "\n$message\n";

    print "\nThis script removes duplicate records from a \"short\" format BLAST output file, and keeps only the \"best\" records.\nIt sorts by smallest e-value and then biggest percent identity.\n";
    print "Usage: bestbenter code herelast.pl <input file> <output file>\n";
    print "\n Author \n";
    print "01/07/2014\n";
}
4

3 に答える 3

1

独自のブラスト パーサーを作成しようとしているのはなぜですか。BioPerl を使用する

http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/HOWTO:SearchIO#NCBI-BLAST_parsing_problems

もうPerlはあまり使わなくなったけど、やるべきことの大まかな考えはこうだ

while (my $result = $report->next_result) {
    print "Query: ".$result->query_name."\n";
    while (my $hit = $result->next_hit) {
        while ($hsp = $hit->next_hsp) {
            my evalue = $hsp->evalue;
            #convert to decimal notation
            $decimal_notation = sprintf("%.10g", $scientific_notation);

            ##... i'll leave the rest up to you
        }
     }
}
于 2014-01-08T19:24:39.017 に答える
0

evalue は科学的表記法であり、perl は小なり比較を行うときにそれを文字列のように扱います。

重複除去も別の方法で行うと思います...

于 2014-01-08T19:19:37.997 に答える
0

シバンの後の上部に「use strict」を追加してみてください。他の何かを見つけるのに役立つ場合があります。

「if($dedupe{$query_id})」を「if(defined($dedupe{$query_id}))」に置き換えてみてください

SO のほとんどの人は生物学者やジェノミストではなく (!)、あなたが何について話しているのかわからないことを心に留めておいてください。もっと助けて。

ちなみに、以下はより慣用的です。

next if $line =~ /^#/;

あなたのコードは常に 64 行目から 81 行目までです。2 次テストにはまったく入らず、重複を見つけることはありません。これをデバッガで実行してみてください:

perl -d yourprog INFILE OUTFILE

次に、「次の行」の「n」を繰り返し実行します。「p変数名」で変数値を出力できます。

split() のセパレーターをタブからスペースに変更すると、これが得られます-少なくとも正しい数の出力レコードがあります:

De-duplicating File...
Argument "in" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "AltName:" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "homolog" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "in" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "in" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "in" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "homolog" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "homolog" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "in" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "Full=Seven" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "homolog" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "absentia" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "in" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "Full=Seven" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "homolog" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "absentia" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "in" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "Full=Seven" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at ./go line 71, <IN> line 21.
Argument "homolog" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Argument "absentia" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at ./go line 75, <IN> line 21.
Total # records = 7
Best only # records = 2
Writing to output file...
Done.
iMac:~/tmp: more out
Tx6_c1_seq1 6439823 RecName: Full=E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase siah-1; AltName: Full=Seven in absentia homolog 1 434 1   9   173 224 282 1e-06   65  32.20   3/0
Tx_11_c0_seq1   977285  RecName: Full=120.7 kDa protein in NOF-FB transposable element  1056    15  957 28  147 455 8e-13   79  27.81   -2/0
于 2014-01-08T19:14:03.167 に答える